New Sticky Note

NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

NOTE: As of the last sim, this league was under the minimum 20% capacity. Invite your friends to join MyFootballNow to keep this league alive! Then send them to this league to become the owner of a team! The league will expire at 1/17/2025 8:00 am.

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

Re: *1989*

By Gustoon - League Admin
3/24/2022 3:36 am
GG Pool /Admiral, knew that would go to the wire and it did. Didn’t expect to lose by crappy tackling though, honours even my friend :)

Re: *1989*

By TheAdmiral
3/24/2022 6:16 am
Gustoon wrote:
GG Pool /Admiral, knew that would go to the wire and it did. Didn’t expect to lose by crappy tackling though, honours even my friend :)


It may well have been the only play of the game that Harry Rivera was in for. We've missed our lead RB and this was a gentle reintroduction for him, way down the depth chart. After a few weeks out and coming in fresh, he wasn't going to let anybody stop him.

Really good game, love this rivalry between the two teams. We're getting some players back from injury now and have hit the summit of the division. Hopefully, we can now take this sort of performance on the road...

Re: *1989*

By TheAdmiral
3/26/2022 9:12 am
Blummin' Incas :O(

Good game Thanos, the battle for field position was mostly won by your boys - deserved win

Re: *1989*

By thanos4real
3/26/2022 9:26 am
Good game, Admiral/Anfield. Tight 'til the end.

Yeah, my punter was the sneaky MVP in this one.

And I would love to know the reason your QB stepped out of the end zone on that safety. Bizarre.

Re: *1989*

By TheAdmiral
3/26/2022 3:29 pm
I think it's an AI logic glitch. My bad for using it so close to my end zone.

QB follows the coding logic of dropping back to throw but doesn't have the awareness to stay in bounds. It may be an Intelligence issue but it's more likely to be a bad play call on my part due to the QB coding.

Re: *1989*

By drogers
3/26/2022 11:28 pm
Good game redneck. I needed a big play to beat you and I got one with that 74 yard pick.

Re: *1989*

By TheAdmiral
3/29/2022 7:38 am
Good game Pentagons

Re: *1989*

By TheAdmiral
3/31/2022 3:10 am
Tough trip to Siberia, we had to dig deep as we were missing a few key starters. The eXplosion's battering ram offense got the yards but not the points. We were forced into going through the air and eventually put a drive together to get the all important touchdown.

Not at our best today but we leave with the win. With the Conference bottle-necked with teams at five and six wins this victory eases the pressure a little as we close out with three more road trips in our final four games.
Last edited at 3/31/2022 3:14 am

Re: *1989*

By Gustoon - League Admin
3/31/2022 8:25 am
GG Blitz, wow didn't expect to win that one, we're now at .500 which I'm over the moon with, progress!

Re: *1989*

By TheAdmiral
4/02/2022 4:22 am
Complete Smash'n'grab at Loch Ness. The Monsters Kicker (Gish) missed 3 of 6 Field Goals and we came back from 9-0 down to get the go ahead TD with 1.10 remaining on the clock.

#LivingOnTheEdge