I would sure hope no one here would scalp anyone :s, But i don't mind either way.

I voted for turn it off, but that's contingent on requiring admin approval of new owners.

Not saying anyone would grab a 2nd team to pilfer players, but why leave the temptation?

i say keep it off, but if trade seems real lop sided they must convince the admin and "possibly say a board of 3 to 5 members chosen by admin (put to a vote) for a logical reason for the trade. I would also add that only the admin (or the board if there is one). can see the reason owners made the trade. On a vote with the board all you would need is a majority. Whether or not discussions among board members would be allowed could be ironed out. perhaps by a vote of the league members. (this vote would be given a time limit say a week admin would not vote for this he would be the deciding vote in a tie breaker)Oh yea and admin will decide if a vote is needed when a complaint arises from anyone. something along these lines. if this isnt done id say keep it on

if it would work properly, i would definitely voted the other way around. Problem is just, it makes some trades realy hard because draftpicks or players are scored super strange.

i am not super expiercend, so i am going to trust the result of the poll anyway, but i'd like to give it a try without the meter.

The trade meter is broken, which is one reason people get fleeced in trades.

Not sure the meter itself is faulty, but the trade values themselves seem jacked-up to me. But,I may be arguing angels on the head of apin

There is no way to move vets with the meter on imo