New Sticky Note

NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

NOTE: As of the last sim, this league was under the minimum 20% capacity. Invite your friends to join MyFootballNow to keep this league alive! Then send them to this league to become the owner of a team! The league will expire at 1/17/2025 8:00 am.

League Forums

Main - Community Help Forum

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By BIDDZZBUCS
3/01/2018 2:54 pm
It is a glitch and should be addressed

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By BIDDZZBUCS
3/01/2018 2:55 pm
It is a glitch used to reduce the effect of fatigue.

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By BIDDZZBUCS
3/01/2018 3:28 pm
Thanks jdavidbakr for killing the glitchers ! I wish we could reset records and erase championships from those who exploit code instead of managing a football team.
Last edited at 3/01/2018 4:07 pm

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By Kababmaster
3/02/2018 8:03 pm
If MFN is a simulation that marks itself to NFL type Football, then the NFL does not "punish" a team for depth. If a rule change is going to be made that afflicts one position due to the fact of having two good QB's, then the same rule should apply equally if a team runs the ball more. If a coach has built a team have two QB's that are 80+ with a good OL and solid WR's, that coach is now not only going to be punished, but will also suffer the Cap punishment of adjusting to the proposed change. Philadelphia won the SB this season in the NFL due to good dept.

If you are going to "punish" a team that likes to pass, and has depth at QB/WR positions to aid their philosophy, then surely it can be considered that a team that likes to run first should be "punished" at depth equally.

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By lellow2011
3/02/2018 11:05 pm
Kababmaster wrote:
If MFN is a simulation that marks itself to NFL type Football, then the NFL does not "punish" a team for depth. If a rule change is going to be made that afflicts one position due to the fact of having two good QB's, then the same rule should apply equally if a team runs the ball more. If a coach has built a team have two QB's that are 80+ with a good OL and solid WR's, that coach is now not only going to be punished, but will also suffer the Cap punishment of adjusting to the proposed change. Philadelphia won the SB this season in the NFL due to good dept.

If you are going to "punish" a team that likes to pass, and has depth at QB/WR positions to aid their philosophy, then surely it can be considered that a team that likes to run first should be "punished" at depth equally.



Teams are not being "punished" for having depth, they are going to stop being "punished" for using 1 QB systems that leads to the QB playing like **** in the 2nd half because of the fatigue aspect. I continually see my high volume passing games play great in the first half only to do absolutely nothing in the 2nd half because for some reason my QB is tired now, that is why people have been using the convoy QB system, not because they have 2 stud QBs. Really you can get good QB play in this game by focusing on just 2-3 attributes when it comes to QBs.
Last edited at 3/04/2018 7:13 pm

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By Kababmaster
3/02/2018 11:41 pm
lellow2011 wrote:
Kababmaster wrote:
If MFN is a simulation that marks itself to NFL type Football, then the NFL does not "punish" a team for depth. If a rule change is going to be made that afflicts one position due to the fact of having two good QB's, then the same rule should apply equally if a team runs the ball more. If a coach has built a team have two QB's that are 80+ with a good OL and solid WR's, that coach is now not only going to be punished, but will also suffer the Cap punishment of adjusting to the proposed change. Philadelphia won the SB this season in the NFL due to good dept.

If you are going to "punish" a team that likes to pass, and has depth at QB/WR positions to aid their philosophy, then surely it can be considered that a team that likes to run first should be "punished" at depth equally.



Teams are being "punished" for having depth, they are going to stop being "punished" for using 1 QB systems that leads to the QB playing like **** in the 2nd half because of the fatigue aspect. I continually see my high volume passing games play great in the first half only to do absolutely nothing in the 2nd half because for some reason my QB is tired now, that is why people have been using the convoy QB system, not because they have 2 stud QBs. Really you can get good QB play in this game by focusing on just 2-3 attributes when it comes to QBs.


For me, this is very much down to philosophy. If I want a team that passes or runs 50-60 pass/runs a game, I should be allowed to do it....correct ? If a rule is introduced to hamper a position that has a major impact on said philosophy, then I'd expect it to be extended to the #2 QB/ #2 RB.

It's not rocket science to be fair.

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By BIDDZZBUCS
3/03/2018 1:11 am
It's a glitch pure and simple. No NFL team "Convoys".

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By BIDDZZBUCS
3/03/2018 1:19 am
Kababmaster wrote:
lellow2011 wrote:
Kababmaster wrote:
If MFN is a simulation that marks itself to NFL type Football, then the NFL does not "punish" a team for depth. If a rule change is going to be made that afflicts one position due to the fact of having two good QB's, then the same rule should apply equally if a team runs the ball more. If a coach has built a team have two QB's that are 80+ with a good OL and solid WR's, that coach is now not only going to be punished, but will also suffer the Cap punishment of adjusting to the proposed change. Philadelphia won the SB this season in the NFL due to good dept.

If you are going to "punish" a team that likes to pass, and has depth at QB/WR positions to aid their philosophy, then surely it can be considered that a team that likes to run first should be "punished" at depth equally.



Teams are being "punished" for having depth, they are going to stop being "punished" for using 1 QB systems that leads to the QB playing like **** in the 2nd half because of the fatigue aspect. I continually see my high volume passing games play great in the first half only to do absolutely nothing in the 2nd half because for some reason my QB is tired now, that is why people have been using the convoy QB system, not because they have 2 stud QBs. Really you can get good QB play in this game by focusing on just 2-3 attributes when it comes to QBs.


For me, this is very much down to philosophy. If I want a team that passes or runs 50-60 pass/runs a game, I should be allowed to do it....correct ? If a rule is introduced to hamper a position that has a major impact on said philosophy, then I'd expect it to be extended to the #2 QB/ #2 RB.

It's not rocket science to be fair.


Stopping glitchers is as fair as it gets.

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By Kababmaster
3/03/2018 1:21 am
BIDDZZBUCS wrote:
It's a glitch pure and simple. No NFL team "Convoys".


It is a glitch to have philosophy ?

If Team A wants to pass 80 times a game and wish to sub in a QB to aid their offence, should a "penalty" or "a reduced effectiveness" be bestowed on Team A ?

Conversely...If Team B wants to run 80 times a game and wish to sub in a RB to aid their offence, should a "penalty" or "a reduced effectiveness" be bestowed on Team B ?

If the answer is "yes" then the answer should be Yes to both philosophies imo.

Re: 2 QBs starters ?

By BIDDZZBUCS
3/03/2018 1:26 am
Kababmaster wrote:
BIDDZZBUCS wrote:
It's a glitch pure and simple. No NFL team "Convoys".


It is a glitch to have philosophy ?

If Team A wants to pass 80 times a game and wish to sub in a QB to aid their offence, should a "penalty" or "a reduced effectiveness" be bestowed on Team A ?

Conversely...If Team B wants to run 80 times a game and wish to sub in a RB to aid their offence, should a "penalty" or "a reduced effectiveness" be bestowed on Team B ?

If the answer is "yes" then the answer should be Yes to both philosophies imo.


NFL Sim here... Please name 1team with an 80 pass per game "philosophy". Please stop defending your exploit.