NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

NOTE: As of the last sim, this league was under the minimum 20% capacity. Invite your friends to join MyFootballNow to keep this league alive! Then send them to this league to become the owner of a team! The league will expire at 1/17/2025 8:00 am.

League Forums

Main - Community Help Forum

Re: Pass block + intelligence = no sacks?

By Booger926
7/30/2017 10:28 pm
raymattison21 wrote:
Booger926 wrote:
raymattison21 wrote:
The three qbs have 100, 100, and 91 intelligence .

And the 5 OL that have played the most plays have an average default pass blocking rating of 88, average strength of 92 and average speed of 91.
The three QB have an default average 83 speed, average strength of 72, average scrambling skill of 82, and a 54 average pass release. They also average 7.3 yards a catch (short plus/medium minus)
The top five WR/TE that have played the most plays have a 85 pass catching average as well as a 97 average speed.
If I had those, you better believe I would throw it short to medium every play also.
So I do not know why you are complaining other than just being jealous. Clearly the coach had a planned scheme and put the right people in the right places to execute it. It's not his fault that you can't keep up.



Your evaluation would dictate a possibility of zero sacks in infinite pass attempts . Saying they had 100 s in everything . As at best a C plus of ratings and scheme generate nfl records?.?.?.? . I would prefer it a bit harder it that what you were suggesting.

Still, I will never know where your energy is coming from. Whether to take it seriously or just another shot at my character . One thing that seems to be regular bussiness for your, but what I know is not is your evaluations.

Nice try ....88 pass block? Jealously is a sin? Complaints ? It's a beta engine in a beta league after a recent change ? Once again thanks, but no thanks. I got medals to find.

None of that dictates sack rates in the nfl........and do you really think straw planned that or came across something that worked and maximizeD the numbers to generate results he wanted after trial and error.

What newb would think intuitively that that would work? To generate nfl records...... Your fool proof plan for no sacks. Please oh please enlightenment is upon us.

Everyone the drama king has entered the thread with nothing valuable to say but personal pot shots. Why don't you just point out my records like your bashing brother flys. The bash bothers are in town!.!.!.!.....better watch out I can't say anything without worrying about these two pros settin me straight. Beat it!

I never knew strength avoided sacks?



Why must you ALWAYS get personal and defensive when some one has another opinion that is different than yours? Why do you have such a low value self esteem of yourself that you feel that everyone is attacking you even when they are trying to enlighten you? Are you truly that insecure? I truly believe that you post such stupid **** just so you can get yourself into an argument. Pathetic.

Ok, since it truly evident that the only football you have ever played is in video game mode, and PUHLEEEEEEZE do not go into your "I am so great that I..." rant like before because no one cares. You hide behind a computer keyboard just like everyone else.

You ask what does strength do to avoid sacks. The 225 bench test in NFL Combine can be evaluated as raw strength endurance. 225 pounds is a weight that is safe and easy to gauge from year-to-year in terms of overall strength endurance, an imperative factor for winning football.

The NFL knows by position how big you are and what your number should be as long as you consistently lift weights. NFL scouts look for a guy who's not afraid to lift and take care of his body. No, you don't have to be a weight room freak. However, you should look at the average numbers, gauge where you currently stand, and then get to where you have to be.

225 bench totals for different-sized athletes to meet NFL status quo are;
•Linemen: 30-39
•Tight Ends and Linebackers: 25-30
•Running Backs: 20-25
•Defensive Backs and Receivers: 15-20

But wait, the Madden junkie is quick to point out that has nothing to due with avoiding sacks. The truth is, Sunshine, that when you have an OL man who is stronger than the oncoming rusher, the OL can just "push" the oncoming rusher out of the way for a moment just long enough for a QB to make a decision. Is it any wonder that the 2nd highest average pay in the NFL does not goes to premier positional players, but to LT, who have averaged 52 reps for the past 8 years, as insurance.

And with the offensive line having a average 88 pass blocking skill, that's a 12% pass failure in case you haven't figured that out. The higher the PB skill, the better the OL man's ability to maintain, react to and prevent a pass rush. Add to that the speed being in relativity to a WR for size, you probally having OL who could react faster to the normal pass rush.

Thru former posts you have cried that your blitzers are not getting to the QB fast enough. Blame that on the OL who will have success 88% of the time keeping that blitzer from reaching the QB.

Just one question for you. How about you stop focusing on the "How come" and start trying to stop the "WHY" The facts are there for you to be successful, you are not just stepping up to the opportunity.

And don't bother trying to answer or repute while sitting from the couch in your mother's basement. I don't care.

Re: Pass block + intelligence = no sacks?

By raymattison21
7/31/2017 7:38 am
I do what I want with out pointing out flaws of others . You continue to "make fun of" as if you were " better".

Technique matters more for line play. It's that simple. Stop putting words out there as if I said them. Your wrong.

Go do something constructive and leave me alone.

Re: Pass block + intelligence = no sacks?

By Booger926
7/31/2017 9:28 am
raymattison21 wrote:
I do what I want with out pointing out flaws of others . You continue to "make fun of" as if you were " better".

Technique matters more for line play. It's that simple. Stop putting words out there as if I said them. Your wrong.

Go do something constructive and leave me alone.


Always the Victim aren't we?
How hard is it foer you to accept that OL RB/PB attributes as well as the general attributes of Speed, Acc, Str, Int, and Dis factor into your "Techniques"? How hard is it for you to understand that the higher the OL attributes, the higher and better the technique is.
The programmers couldn't zapp real line men into the game, so they had to use 1's and 0's to figure out a game.
Last edited at 7/31/2017 9:37 am

Re: Pass block + intelligence = no sacks?

By raymattison21
7/31/2017 10:59 am
Back to me playing the victim ? You seek my comments out and counter with personal attacks. Clearly you do not know what a victim is. And or how to stand up for what is ethical .

Also, point out out nothing that I am talking about and have it favor what you are saying is pointless to my "complaint " in the first place . Like I said please stop.

Re: Pass block + intelligence = no sacks?

By Booger926
7/31/2017 11:26 am
raymattison21 wrote:
Back to me playing the victim ? You seek my comments out and counter with personal attacks. Clearly you do not know what a victim is. And or how to stand up for what is ethical .

Also, point out out nothing that I am talking about and have it favor what you are saying is pointless to my "complaint " in the first place . Like I said please stop.


Dude, seriously, seek psychological help.
If you want me to stop, then don't reply.

Re: Pass block + intelligence = no sacks?

By raymattison21
7/31/2017 11:41 am
Booger926 wrote:
raymattison21 wrote:
Back to me playing the victim ? You seek my comments out and counter with personal attacks. Clearly you do not know what a victim is. And or how to stand up for what is ethical .

Also, point out out nothing that I am talking about and have it favor what you are saying is pointless to my "complaint " in the first place . Like I said please stop.


Dude, seriously, seek psychological help.
If you want me to stop, then don't reply.



Many know how to help without putting other down. Beat it.

Re: Pass block + intelligence = no sacks?

By raymattison21
7/31/2017 11:48 am
Booger926 wrote:
raymattison21 wrote:
Back to me playing the victim ? You seek my comments out and counter with personal attacks. Clearly you do not know what a victim is. And or how to stand up for what is ethical .

Also, point out out nothing that I am talking about and have it favor what you are saying is pointless to my "complaint " in the first place . Like I said please stop.


Dude, seriously, seek psychological help.
If you want me to stop, then don't reply.


The only thing you helped is to mathematically show how far off the value of athletic ratings are for oline, but I knew that already .

Re: Pass block + intelligence = no sacks?

By raymattison21
7/31/2017 11:50 am
Booger926 wrote:
raymattison21 wrote:
Back to me playing the victim ? You seek my comments out and counter with personal attacks. Clearly you do not know what a victim is. And or how to stand up for what is ethical .

Also, point out out nothing that I am talking about and have it favor what you are saying is pointless to my "complaint " in the first place . Like I said please stop.


Dude, seriously, seek psychological help.
If you want me to stop, then don't reply.



Some life advice for you would be to eat better, and try a detoxification program.