NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - Bug Box

Defensive Rules vs. 320

By tribewriter
9/13/2017 7:33 am
When I am setting up a defensive rule, the 320 set (3RB, 2TE) is not among the choices in my dropdown menu.

Re: Defensive Rules vs. 320

By jlyman
9/13/2017 11:32 am
tribewriter wrote:
When I am setting up a defensive rule, the 320 set (3RB, 2TE) is not among the choices in my dropdown menu.


I think there's only an offensive formation with 3 RBs, 1 TE and 1 WR. All other formations have either 2, 1 or no RB.

Re: Defensive Rules vs. 320

By tribewriter
10/13/2017 10:02 am
OK, just to prove I am not crazy, I am going to submit this again. And, this time, with documentation.

My opponent ran this against me five times in my most recent game. The play is PA TE Drag out of the goal line set. It includes three RB and two TE. But, when I am trying to put together my defensive rules, there is no 320 option in the dropdown menu.

The game:
https://usflwfl.myfootballnow.com/log/425

The play card (screen shot):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2LDeuIJ5G-pa2xFVVBNd2Z6R2c/view?usp=sharing

The personnel card (screen shot):
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2LDeuIJ5G-pcjdHWjFZSmRMMWs/view?usp=sharing
Last edited at 10/13/2017 12:46 pm

Re: Defensive Rules vs. 320

By Bryson10
10/13/2017 10:05 am
it's just the 2rb3te formation. for some reason the player card always lists the third te as a fb. Pretty much every playbook has that PA TE drag, you can see it if you just look through your own playbook and check the 2RB3TE formation.

Re: Defensive Rules vs. 320

By tribewriter
10/13/2017 10:43 am
That may be true, but it's still confusing, especially when you are trying to game-plan against it. The card should list the third TE as a TE.