NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - Bug Box

Wr at TE

By raymattison21
7/28/2017 7:06 am
Not only is is it a complete tell of whether it will be a run or a pass for some reason a WR has no problem blocking larger stronger players like DE and OLB .

Any defense should key on these positionAL overrides as tells of what type of play the will see upon that alignment as these guys are put in to run block or specifically run routes vs. A Lb. (Run keys and pass keys should change with his abuse)

As the defense can only match by playing players out of postion also via overides and rules. The bigger problem is that a DE would destroy a wr lining up at TE upon his release as well would a LB. And even when they do run block the descrepancy in size is not enough to make of for the effect strength has on blocking.

In mfn one I did this as an experiment to see the effect on size and strength and effectiveness . Something was done about line play why not all players . TE plays on the line? Small DES are pointless but small TES are effective ?

Re: Wr at TE

By punisher
7/28/2017 11:41 am
raymattison21 wrote:
Not only is is it a complete tell of whether it will be a run or a pass for some reason a WR has no problem blocking larger stronger players like DE and OLB .

Any defense should key on these positionAL overrides as tells of what type of play the will see upon that alignment as these guys are put in to run block or specifically run routes vs. A Lb. (Run keys and pass keys should change with his abuse)

As the defense can only match by playing players out of postion also via overides and rules. The bigger problem is that a DE would destroy a wr lining up at TE upon his release as well would a LB. And even when they do run block the descrepancy in size is not enough to make of for the effect strength has on blocking.

In mfn one I did this as an experiment to see the effect on size and strength and effectiveness . Something was done about line play why not all players . TE plays on the line? Small DES are pointless but small TES are effective ?


i think i found this one on your MFN 1 team

New Orleans = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/team/30

John Martin = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/player/12485
Joseph Dupre = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/player/11939
Kent McNulty = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/player/10971

New Orleans won 46 -23 over Oakland Raiders
box score = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/box/view/6737
game log = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/log/6737
game center = https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/gamecenter/view/6737#1217063

Re: Wr at TE

By raymattison21
7/28/2017 9:26 pm
I played Mcnultley as a small TE for seasons. He was a te bust I switched to wr where he lost 40 pounds , but still played TE while my back still had consecutive 1500 yard seasons. Now I have AI drafted TES playing TE

Re: Wr at TE

By Booger926
7/28/2017 11:11 pm
raymattison21 wrote:
I played Mcnultley as a small TE for seasons. He was a te bust I switched to wr where he lost 40 pounds , but still played TE while my back still had consecutive 1500 yard seasons. Now I have AI drafted TES playing TE

And who's at fault for this failure?

Re: Wr at TE

By raymattison21
7/29/2017 7:06 am
Booger926 wrote:
raymattison21 wrote:
I played Mcnultley as a small TE for seasons. He was a te bust I switched to wr where he lost 40 pounds , but still played TE while my back still had consecutive 1500 yard seasons. Now I have AI drafted TES playing TE

And who's at fault for this failure?




TEs are not in the same blocking code as oline/dline. t hey should be using the same level of weight to strength ratios as line play, because they are linemen on alot of plays,