NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - Bug Box

Not all human teams available as trade partners in new UI

By dei1c3
2/14/2016 11:18 pm
When I go to the New Trade dialogue in the current UI all human owners are listed as available trade partners in the drop down box. In the new UI the list is incomplete:

CUST-21: The list is missing Corellia (MistbornJedi), San Francisco (LittleBear6969), and New York City (rhaums_).

CUST-35: Mordor (MistbornJedi), Denver (timinator1324), New York City (Khalb917), and Nashville (hparham865).

Is this expected (if so, what's the reason) or no?

Re: Not all human teams available as trade partners in new UI

By MistbornJedi
2/14/2016 11:48 pm
Interesting. In the new UI I cannot initiate a trade. The trade page includes this:

"New accounts are restricted from making trades until they are 30 days old."

So looks like may be intentional since I've only been playing for a couple weeks. Though I have to say I don't see the need for the rule.

Re: Not all human teams available as trade partners in new UI

By ibblacklavender02
2/15/2016 6:24 am
MistbornJedi wrote:
Interesting. In the new UI I cannot initiate a trade. The trade page includes this:

"New accounts are restricted from making trades until they are 30 days old."

So looks like may be intentional since I've only been playing for a couple weeks. Though I have to say I don't see the need for the rule.


New players kept on getting shafted doing trades....The new trade meter helps this a lot but it still happens...So I guess it was decided to make new players wait...Plus you can see the type of trades people make....

Re: Not all human teams available as trade partners in new UI

By WarEagle
2/15/2016 6:25 am
It's intentional and was added so new owners will have an opportunity to learn more about how this game works before they start making trades.

It's so hopefully they don't start making bad deals they think are fair at the time, and end up hurting their team so much they quit.

There are some owners on here who jump at the chance to offer a newbie a trade, hoping they'll give up a 2nd round pick for a 4th, 5th and 6th (for example).

Re: Not all human teams available as trade partners in new UI

By dei1c3
2/15/2016 12:01 pm
Thanks for the responses. I must have missed this one in the list of new features.

Re: Not all human teams available as trade partners in new UI

By punisher
2/16/2016 7:31 pm
dei1c3 wrote:
When I go to the New Trade dialogue in the current UI all human owners are listed as available trade partners in the drop down box. In the new UI the list is incomplete:
CUST-21: The list is missing Corellia (MistbornJedi), San Francisco (LittleBear6969), and New York City (rhaums_).
CUST-35: Mordor (MistbornJedi), Denver (timinator1324), New York City (Khalb917), and Nashville (hparham865).
Is this expected (if so, what's the reason) or no?

MistbornJedi wrote:
Interesting. In the new UI I cannot initiate a trade. The trade page includes this:
"New accounts are restricted from making trades until they are 30 days old."
So looks like may be intentional since I've only been playing for a couple weeks. Though I have to say I don't see the need for the rule.

ibblacklavender02 wrote:

New players kept on getting shafted doing trades....The new trade meter helps this a lot but it still happens...So I guess it was decided to make new players wait...Plus you can see the type of trades people make....



Reason why there is a 30 days for each account is because what happened in MFN 1 that had Detroit involved of dismantling their team.

here is when the 30 day thing came about = http://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/799?page=0

here is other trades that Detroit did to dismantle their team = http://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/812?page=0#4336
here is another one = http://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/795?page=0

Last edited at 2/16/2016 7:33 pm