New Sticky Note

NOTICE: This league is using the BLEEDING EDGE game engine. For more information, click here.

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - Community Help Forum

Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By Wolfkill
3/15/2020 2:03 pm
What is more useful? Which is better? Is there a difference?
Any opinions?

Re: Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By raidergreg69
3/15/2020 2:12 pm
I only look at bump and run for DB's but M2M for both. I would think LB aren't usually in position to bump and run against a RB or TE with a running start.

Re: Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By Wolfkill
3/15/2020 2:53 pm
raidergreg69 wrote:
I only look at bump and run for DB's but M2M for both. I would think LB aren't usually in position to bump and run against a RB or TE with a running start.


Understood, yet they show both as major attributes for a defensive coach.
Kind'a conflicting.

Re: Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By setherick
3/16/2020 7:54 pm
B&R is essential if you are going to flex your WLB to a WR when you stay in base against the 113 or 203.

Re: Better for LB? (B&R or M2M)

By CrazySexyBeast
3/28/2020 8:58 pm
MLB needs both z/m2m. OLB need higher br/c, m2m vs zone.
Then again, is one running more m2m (much more viable in 4.5 as zone STILL has issues *hoping 4.6) over zone in the LB D? Right now, MLB needs both in equality (+70) and OLBs need more m2m/br/c.
There are position weights/clues available for 4.5 within the forum search.
:)